Services Case Studies How It Works Join Us Apply to Work With Us
Case Study

12 OF creators signed in 30 days, CPL halved week 1

Engagement: Jan 2025 — Sep 2025 (closed; system handed off internally) · Page last reviewed: May 2026

OnlyFans Agency Romania
Back to all case studies
12OF creators signed · 30 days
−40%Blended CPL drop, week 1
€2–4Blended CPL · Romania, Meta
60%+Interview show rate

Agency name withheld. Under the engagement agreement with this agency, and because competitor poaching of recruited creators is active in the Romanian OnlyFans market, the agency's name is not published.

Agency profile

Agency type
OnlyFans management agency
Country & city
Romania — major city (Bucharest metro area)
Roster size band
20–40 creators (pre-engagement)
Primary platforms
OnlyFans, Fansly (secondary)
Languages
Romanian (RO), English (EN)
Engagement length
9 months (Jan–Sep 2025)
Services delivered
Framer recruitment site, pre-qualification form, Meta ads, Brevo automation, Make.com CRM, WhatsApp HR cadence

The situation when they called us

The agency's recruitment pipeline was stalling. Generic ad creatives that looked identical to every other Romanian agency — the same stock imagery, the same vague headlines, the same "earn from home" copy every competitor had been recycling for years. Their application form had no pre-qualification: anyone could submit, and everyone did. HR was burning 20–30 minutes per interview on people who had no realistic intention of starting.

The post-submission flow was the second hole. An applicant filled out the form and then heard nothing. No confirmation. No SMS. No callback. Someone on the team would eventually check the submissions the next morning, maybe reach out a day or two later. By that point most leads had moved on or felt embarrassed enough to stop responding. Their blended CPL through the prior channel was sitting above €5 and rising as creatives fatigued.

What they had already tried

The agency had been on Google Ads for the previous 18 months. A series of in-house and freelancer campaigns through the year before us. CPL had drifted up from around €3.50 to over €5 as more competitors moved into the same keyword set, and the lead quality didn't justify the spend. Two separate freelance media buyers had been hired and let go in 2024. The internal read by January 2025 was that "online recruitment doesn't work for our agency" — the prior we had to overcome before we could touch anything.

How money flows

  1. The agency pays Icon a fixed monthly retainer in EUR, invoiced on day 1 of each calendar month.
  2. The agency manages creator payouts and revenue share with its creators directly. Icon never touches creator accounts, OnlyFans logins, or creator earnings.
  3. No commission on creator earnings, no signing fees, no per-applicant pricing. The retainer is the only number on the invoice.

What we built

First deliverable: a new Romanian-language recruitment site on Framer. The centrepiece was a redesigned application form with a built-in pre-qualification step — a short conversational sequence that quietly screened for age, availability, willingness to create content, and basic tech requirements before HR ever saw the lead. The form felt easy and fast to complete; it filtered without telling the applicant it was filtering.

Paid media: Romanian-language Meta campaigns with a specific creative posture — privacy-led, income-second. This wasn't arbitrary. Romanian applicants in this vertical worry about anonymity more than applicants in any other market we've worked in. Fear of being recognised, fear of family finding out, fear of social stigma. If the first three seconds of the ad doesn't address that concern, the applicant scrolls past regardless of what the income line says.

Post-submission flow: automated confirmation within 60 seconds via Brevo (Romanian copy, casual register). Then a same-day WhatsApp message from the agency's HR contact within two hours of submission. Not email. Not a phone call. WhatsApp is the default channel in Romania for this demographic and any other channel hits a much lower response rate. Make.com wired the form, Brevo, and the WhatsApp queue together so the agency could see every lead's state in real time without manual checks.

Timeline

  1. Week 1 — Audit + site liveReviewed prior Google Ads spend, prior site, prior form. Shipped the new Framer site, pre-qualification form, Brevo automation, Make.com pipeline. Ad accounts warmed.
  2. Week 1 — Channel test (Meta + Google split)Initially ran Meta and Google in parallel on a small split budget to verify our channel hypothesis before committing. Meta hit €2–4 CPL inside three days. Google came in at €6–8 with comparable lead quality.
  3. Day 7 — Google killed, Meta scaledReallocated the Google budget to Meta. (See "What we got wrong" below — we should not have run Google at all.)
  4. Week 2 — WhatsApp follow-up cadence lockedAgency HR committed to the 2-hour WhatsApp SLA during business hours. Show-rate climbed past 60% within five days.
  5. Week 4 — 12 signedDay 30 of the campaign closed at 12 signed, onboarded OF creators. Blended CPL settled at €2–4.
  6. Months 3–6 — Creative refresh cyclePrivacy-led angle stayed dominant; rotated visuals roughly every 3–4 weeks to manage fatigue. CPL held in the €2–4 band.
  7. Months 7–9 — Internal hand-offThe agency hired a full-time internal media lead. Icon ran a 6-week structured hand-off — ad account, Make.com playbook, Brevo sequences, screening rubric, creative brief library. Engagement closed clean in September 2025.

What we got wrong

We ran Google Ads in week 1. We shouldn't have. The agency had been on Google for 18 months and our read going in was that the channel was wrong for the market, but we hedged anyway — we put about 30% of the test budget through Google "to verify" before recommending Meta-only. By day 5 Google was sitting at €6–8 CPL against Meta's €2–4 with comparable lead quality. We killed Google by day 7 and moved the budget.

The mistake cost roughly €1,200 in inefficient spend. More importantly, it slowed the week-1 confidence signal we owed the agency — the first dashboard they saw had a Google row dragging the blended CPL up. We should have trusted the channel read on day one and run Meta-only from the start. We log the question "is there any market-specific reason to test Google in week 1?" in every new engagement now, and the default answer is no.

Results

Blended CPL halved in week 1 — from the agency's prior €5+ on Google to €2–4 on Meta. Not a slow ramp. The combination of a tighter audience, Romanian-language privacy-first creative, and a cheaper underutilised channel produced the drop almost immediately.

The 30-day number landed at 12 signed creators. Not 12 applications. Not 12 interviews. Twelve onboarded creators generating revenue for the agency. The pre-qualification form cut unqualified interviews by roughly half — HR went from burning the majority of their interview hours on dead-end conversations to spending them almost exclusively with applicants who could realistically start.

MetricBefore IconAfter (steady state, month 2+)
Primary recruitment channelGoogle Ads — generic creativeMeta → Framer + pre-qual form → WhatsApp HR
Blended CPL€5+ (and rising)€2–4 −~40%
Applications / month~25–35 (untracked)80–120 (tracked) ~3×
Unqualified interview rate~70% of interviews dead-end~30% half cut
Interview show rate~25%60%+ 2.4×
Time from submit to first contact~24–48 hours (email)~2 hours (WhatsApp)
Creators signed · first 30 days0–212

The market-level insight. Every Romanian agency copies the same playbook — Google Ads, maybe some TikTok. Almost none run Meta for recruitment. Meta CPLs in Romania sit at €2–4. Google Ads CPLs in this vertical run €4–10+. Lead quality is comparable. You're paying half the price for the same type of applicant, on a platform where you have almost no competition from other agencies. The arbitrage won't last forever — once two or three Romanian agencies move to Meta, the audience saturation will reset CPLs. Right now, in mid-2026, it's still open.

How to verify this case study

Every number above ties to a primary artifact — Meta Ads Manager exports, the Google Ads kill log, Make.com pipeline screenshots, Brevo sequence logs, the signed engagement letter and hand-off documentation. We don't publish those here because the agency asked us not to. We'll show you under signed NDA on a 15-minute verification call.

On the call we'll walk you through:

  • The actual Meta Ads Manager dashboard for this campaign — date filter Jan–Sep 2025, CPL column, spend column, real numbers visible
  • The Google Ads kill log from week 1, including CPL deltas vs Meta and the day-7 decision rationale
  • The Make.com CRM pipeline showing every lead state from application to signed creator contract
  • One redacted Brevo sequence with WhatsApp timestamps so you see the response cadence
  • The internal hand-off checklist used in months 7–9 to transfer operations to the agency's internal team

Reach Icon Acquisition: contact@iconacquisition.com · WhatsApp message.

What you see above is what actually happened for one specific agency, over a specific date range, in a specific market, with a specific budget and team. The same numbers will not apply to your agency. Markets differ (Bucharest CPLs are not Budapest CPLs are not Bogotá CPLs). Agencies differ (roster, creator quality, commission structure, brand). Teams differ. Anyone in this industry who promises you guaranteed signups, guaranteed earnings, or a guaranteed Top 0.1% spot is selling you a scam. We don't.

12OF CREATORS SIGNED · 30 DAYS
−40%BLENDED CPL DROP, WEEK 1
€2–4BLENDED CPL (ROMANIA, META)
60%+INTERVIEW SHOW RATE
Is this you?

Run the same playbook for your agency

We'll audit your current recruitment, name the bottleneck, and show you what the first 60 days would actually look like. No spec template. No "guaranteed" anything.